|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
The Major Principles of an SDL Program |
|
What are the major
principles on which we can build an SDL program and what will
the main features of such programs be? Here are the 5 main
principles: |
|
|
The first principle is that programs should be congruent
with a life of learning, the natural ways we learn and the unique
methods by which each of us learns best. The basic assumption
of SDL is that from birth to death we live lives of learning -
- learning to function then to live well and finally to make a
difference. Learning is a natural process outlined both by the
history of our species and our history as individuals. Our success
depends upon the range, depth and quality of the learning we achieve.
Each of us exhibits and develops these natural capacities in an
individual way according to the talents we are endowed with, the
experiences we encounter, the strengths we discover, the interests
that begin to direct and motivate us and the patterns of learning
that we develop. An SDL program should be congruent with these
lifelong, natural and individual learning drives. |
|
|
The second principle is that programs should be
adapted to the maturation, transformations and transitions experienced
by students, in this case, adolescent students. Adolescents experience
rapid physical, cerebral and hormonal change that is often destabilizing.
Among the transformations or passages that they must address,
the most important is establishing and confirming a personal,
stable identity. Key features of this formation are the development
of reflection, character and competence. The major transition
they face is from dependent childhood to independent early adulthood
in which they must secure new freedoms and meet the responsibilities
that go with them. SDL programs are designed to cultivate the
successful accomplishment of these changes in the pursuit of excellence
as a person. |
|
|
The third principle is that programs should be concerned
with all aspects of a full life. Academic studies are important
and included, but so also are the personal, social and technical
domains of human experience. The personal domain is focused on
the cultivation of the individual’s talents, values and
interests. The social domain is concerned with the individual’s
ability to relate to others, to learn from them and to work with
them. In the technical domain emphasis is placed upon competence,
performance and productivity. In SDL focus on these domains is
as important as focus on academics, in part for their contribution
to academic success, in the main because they are for a successful
life of learning. |
|
|
The fourth principle is that learning in SDL programs
should employ a full range of human capacities, including our
senses, emotions and actions as well as our intellects. SDL is
grounded in direct experience. Experience is absorbed by finely
honed senses. The mind reflects, investigates and plans. Feelings
stir, drive and direct our thoughts and efforts. But our senses,
feelings and thoughts all focus on action, the application to
productivity and the production of palpable outcomes. SDL is designed
to hone awareness, cultivate drive, encourage thoughtful conclusions
and shape plans that all lead to the successful achievement of
challenging outcomes. |
|
|
The fifth principle is that SDL activities should
be conducted in settings suited to their development. The classroom
is a useful setting if it is converted to serve SDL, but even
converted it is a limited environment. Many experiences can be
brought into the classroom directly or indirectly through simulation
and the media. But SDL thrives best when the setting is expanded
to include a broader range of people to learn from and places
in which to learn. This begins with the local community and spreads
outward to include the widest possible experience of challenge
in the world. Many studies are learned best on site. We learn
about others and their lives by knowing them directly and working
with them. We develop character by service and other caring acts.
We learn by challenging ourselves in real world situations. These
are the five basic principles that guide the development of SDL
programs and the substance of this book. |
|
|
The Essential Elements of SDL |
|
The next question
is “What are the actual elements of SDL based on these
general principles?” |
|
|
The first element is student control
over as much of the learning experience as possible. The major
shift from TDL to SDL is a shift in the locus of control from
the teacher to the student. For the student, this represents a
shift from outer control to inner control. Such a shift reflects
the major change underway in the lives of adolescents as they
begin to establish themselves as individuals separate from their
childhood dependencies. During these years they begin to shape
their own opinions and ideas, to make their own decisions, choose
their own activities, take more responsibility for themselves
and begin to work. Charging students with the task of developing
their own learning, turns them to their own resources, which develops
their emerging individuality and helps them to rehearse more adult
roles. As they become more self-directing, they not only learn
effectively but become more themselves. |
|
|
The second element of SDL is skill development.
Inner control is aimless unless students learn to focus and apply
their talents and energies intensely. For this reason the emphasis
in SDL is on the development of skills and processes that lead
to productive activity. Students learn to achieve course outcomes,
to think independently and to plan and execute their own activities.
These processes, and the skills involved in them, come together
in student proposals for study and action. They prepare and then
negotiate them with their teachers, often in the form of written
agreements, which become records of the contracts that they negotiate.
The intent is to provide a framework that enables students to
identify their interests and equips them to realize them successfully.
|
|
|
The third element is students learning to challenge themselves
to their best possible performance. Self-direction is dormant
without challenge. First teachers challenge students and then
they challenge them to challenge themselves. Challenge involves
reaching for a new level of performance in a familiar field or
launching an adventure into a new field of interest. It means
setting the standard of achievement a step higher than one can
readily achieve. Challenging oneself means taking the risk to
go beyond the easy and familiar. For those willing, it means reaching
regularly for performances that demand from them the very best
they have to offer. The challenge is to go out far and in deep:
it is the challenge of the hero’s journey. |
|
|
The fourth element is student self-management, management
of themselves and of their learning enterprises. In SDL choices
and freedoms are matched by self-control and responsibilities.
Students learn to express self-control by searching for, and making
a commitment to, core personal interests and aspirations. In this
process they determine not only what they will do but the kind
of performer they will become. SDL requires confidence, courage
and determination to energize the effort involved. Students develop
these attributes as they become skilled in managing their own
time, effort and the resources they need to conduct their work.
Even well organized efforts run aground. In the face of obstacles,
students learn to face their difficulties, find alternatives and
solve their problems in order to maintain effective productivity.
The combination of inner resources and performative skill required
for self-management in SDL is the same process students will require
for the successful management of growth and productivity throughout
their lives. |
|
|
The fifth element is that students motivate and
assess their own efforts. Many principles of motivation
are built into the design of SDL, such as the pursuit
of one’s own
high-interest goals. When students adopt these principles
they become the major elements of self-motivation.
By setting important
goals for themselves, arranging for feedback on their
work and achieving success, for example, they learn
to inspire their own
efforts. Similarly, students learn to evaluate their
own progress. They plan the method by which their
work will be assessed and
usually negotiate the terms with the teachers. These
terms are often stated in the learning proposals
that students present.
Since the responsibility for proving that they have achieved
their goals lies with students, they gather their
proofs and/or products
in a portfolio, which becomes the focus of evaluation.
Just as self-motivation energizes students to produce
the achievements
that are evaluated, self-assessment motivates students
to seek the best possible achievement. |
|
|
The five elements outline the underlying structure
of SDL activities and programs. They also describe the challenge
of SDL for the teacher as well as for the student. Many programs
permit self-direction, too few teach students how to be self-directed.
The focus in what follows is on teaching SDL. |
|
|
|
|
| Maurice Gibbons (c) 2008 Personal Power Press International |
|